An introduction to Heat Exchange
Systems
draft February 2007
Bryan Hirst.
This paper is intended to serve as a general guide and
introduction for end users, specifiers and others interested in Heat Exchange systems and their applications.
Heat exchanger systems
for space heating and
cooling have been widely used
overseas, however they are relative newcomers in The United Kingdom.
Recently the UK
Government has become committed to
reducing the carbon footprint or fossil fuel requirement of property of all
types especially in new buildings.
Oil is too good to burn. There is concern about Global Warming. All the drivers are in place for new
technologies to have a rapid expansion in practical applications in buildings.
This will be achieved with better insulation and building specifications,
ground, air and solar heat exchangers and new technology including the
generation of electricity using bio- fuels, wind and direct solar energy.
Ground source heat exchangers are used for heating and cooling of buildings
with a low carbon footprint. This will be achieved in conjunction with other
technologies such as solar exchangers, heat pumps and under floor heating and
cooling technology.
The technology will change and improve with time as it
becomes widely used.
Intoduction
After working
with solar panel and ground source
heat exchange manufacturers and
visiting heat pump manufacturers and importers, consultants, system designers
and contractors and taking part in
installations I feel that I have
a grasp of what is involved in the
creation of no carbon and low carbon buildings utilising heat exchangers and hope that this simple primer
will be of help to others on the same pathway.
As I have been trained as an ecologist and designer rather
than an engineer I have attempted to put the information I have gleaned in
language that can be understood by laymen. Engineers may grind their teeth!
I have outlined below the different forms of geo source
energy available now as well as
the benefits and limitations of
practical applications from each form.
Forms of
Earth heat energy
Geo source heat (or energy) comes in two forms:
1. Geothermal energy from the hot core of the earth.
On Lanzarote in the Canary Islands lunch can be cooked by placing a metal grill over a hole in
the earth where heat erupts from the earths core. Lanzarote is one of a chain of volcanic islands in the
Atlantic ocean. Most recently In the 19th century Volcanic eruptions devastated the island. Today, at a tourist centre built on a
volcano rim there is still enough heat rising from molten material below the
earths crust to grill food. This form of energy is also used in Iceland where
it is used to provide central
heating and hot water for the
inhabitants of the capital Reykjavik.
At only a few
places on the earths surface is this energy is available; generally it is only
accessible by drilling several kilometres into the earthÕs crust, in a way that
is not cost effective. In the
Netherlands, however, where deep wells were drilled for natural gas and all the
gas has been extracted, the wells are now used with heat exchangers to extract
earthÕs core energy to warm greenhouses.
Interestingly, health benefits have been noticed from water
that has been passed through open loop deep geothermal systems. Perhaps rare minerals are released which
benefit plants and animals.
In the U.K. this form of core energy is rarely of practical
use using current technology, though an exception is found at the springs in the City of Bath. Water at 45 degrees C (perfect
bathing temperature) issues from springs as it has since pre Roman times.
Another form of core energy can be found in Cornwall where
isotopes in the granite rock as they degenerate create heat the which can be used for heat
exchangers. Specialists can advise on the rare practical applications.
In the UK it is exceptional if earth core energy has
practical applications.
2. Ground
source heat
energy comes from the daily and annual heating of the earthÕs surface by the
sun. The surface layers act as a
heat store or pool from which energy can be extracted or sunk. At 5 metres
below ground level the ground is at a constant temperature (above the air
temperature in the winter and below it in the summer.) The transfer of this
heat between the earth and our buildings
will replace current methods of burning fuel in boilers or power stations.
As with wells, care must be taken,
since to extract or insert too much energy from around a heat exchanger impairs the efficiency of the system as
it will have the effect of temporarily heating or cooling a small area until
more energy ÒtricklesÓ out from or into the surrounding ground. In some cases
This ÒbatteryÓ effect can be harnessed to
improve efficiencies.
How Heat
pumps work.
Essentially ground source heat exchangers, in conjunction
with heat pumps, exploit stored solar energy in the ground and make practical
use of the potential difference
exchanged.
(energy).
A refrigerator works on the same principle. Heat is taken by
the evaporator from warm food (the ground ) and expelled by the condenser to
the radiator on the back of the fridge (the under floor heating array)
In a heat pump there are essentially 4 parts:
a compressor
a condenser
an evaporator
an expansion valve
These are inter connected and set in a box .
The
thermal energy is transferred to (or from) the building.
What matters most
is the Coefficency of
Performance (COP) which measures the amount of energy required to
operate the system. For example, if 1 kw of energy is required to produce 4kw of heating the COP figure
is 4.
If 1kw of
energy is required to produce 2.5kw of energy the COP figure is 2.5.
The higher the COP figure the more efficient the
system. and the less carbon is generated for the work to be done.
The less work the heat pump has to to do raise or lower
temperature the greater the COP figure will be.
Heat pumps are expected to last over 25 years. The major
limitation is from the wear when the compressor starts and stops.
The less energy needed to heat or cool a house the smaller
the electrical bill. Heat pumps work best as part of a complete system
and are at their best in new build property or major conversions where all the parts of the
system are considered and matched.
As well as lowering the carbon footprint of buildings when
correctly used heat pumps and integrated systems offer benefits including:
a) no fire hazard
b) increased comfort in buildings as the temperature is more
controllable.
c) no maintenance requirements.
d) a long anticipated life.
e) no wall mounted
radiators required.
A system is designed after a series of calculations:
First the heat requirement of the property has to be
calculated. This is measured in Watts per square metre (the floor area to be
heated) per hour against an exterior temperature of 0 degrees centigrade (in
the UK). This is calculated using tables (available on the internet) which put
a figure against any material material. For example a 9 inch unplastered brick wall of 1 square meter will have a demand of 2.2 and a
well insulated cavity wall a demand of .6 per square metre.
The total heat demand
for the area to be heated depends on the temperature differential between the exterior and the interior
The lower the exterior temperature the greater the heat
demand. A modern well insulated house will demand about 40 watts per
square metre at an exterior temperature of 0 degrees centigrade whilst an old building may have a heat demand of up to 200 watts per square metre.
When the area to be heated and the heat requirement has been
assested the total maximum demand
is calculated in kilowatts.
When that figure has been calculated it is possible to size
the heat pump. A heat pump is
either on and producing energy at
full capacity or off producing nothing.
There is often an advantage in under sizing a heat pump. For
example, suppose a house needs 5
kw to heat it effectively at 0 degrees centigrade and a 5 kw heat pump were to
be fitted. most of the time the
external temperature will be above 0 degrees. The desired temperature would be
quickly achieved and the pump switched off . The temperature would drop and the
heat pump would come on again and short;y after off again off and on etc. This
wears out the compressor and shortens the life of the system.
This problem can be overcome in 2 principle ways.
1.Use a buffer tank.
A buffer tank is a well insulated tank containing a fluid
(either water or petroleum gel) which is heated to the temperature required for
the underfloor heating . When the pump is turned off the energy in the tank can
be used to maintain temperature for a period, generally over an hour, reducing the frequency of on off (duty) cycles. Rather like an electrical capacitor.
2.Undersize the heat pump.
For example:
If the maximum demand is 5 kW and the average demand 3 kw a 3 kw heat pump
will work consistently and efficiently to maintain a temperature. If the demand is greater than the
ability of the 3k heat pump to provide it can be supplemented with, for
example, an immersion heater. It
will be relatively rarely that the supplementary heating is required. This will
save on the capital cost of the equipment and the increase in the electrical
bill will be small compared to the capital cost of a larger heat pump. However
it will reduce the all important COP.
The coefficient of performance is directly related to the
change in temperature from input to out put.
Underfloor Heating.
Underfloor water heating has various advantages over
traditional radiators, most noticeably in the lower operating temperatures.(
approximately 35c)
Other benefits
of under floor heating include the lack need for radiators which take
valuably space, and send out convection heat which rises to the ceiling . The
same degree of comfort requires less energy (between 5% and 20%) from underfloor heating.
The disadvantage of underfloor heating is that is is not
possible to supply more that about
100 watts per square metre. A greater demand would require a higher water temperature which would
adversely affect the COP
Water for bathing and washing is generally required at about
50 degrees C. this is about 15 degrees C higher than the requirement for
underfloor heating There are
different approaches to this demand from different schools with the industry,
at present the British manufacturer Kensa engineering suggests that its heat pumps
are only used to produce space heating as this can be done at a high COP.
Others manufacturers
such as IVT install dual systems which allow the water to be heated to
higher temperature , either using an immersion heater or at a lower COP.
Add to the formula to include solar heat exchangers which
introduce energy which can be
stored either in a buffer tank or transferred to the
earth via the exterior heat exchangers.
In cities the
ambient temperature may be up to 8
degrees warmer than in the country,
this is because of the amounts of
solar energy absorbed by the
glass, concrete and tarmac
of cities such as London
In cities the
energy needed to cool properties is almost as great as the heating need.
Heat may be transferred to the ground via the external heat
exchangers. However underfloor water pipes are not very effective at
cooling because cold air
sinks and tends therefore to sit
on the floor surface providing a blanket to reduce heat exchange, a secondary
danger is that the cooling air may reach its dew point depositing water on the floor surface.
For cooling it is much more efficient if air is passed over
cold water warming the water. This
energy can be transferred to the air or the ground.
In certain instances a heat pump is not needed and energy
directly is transferred to the end use (for example: airport runways or roads.)
This is generally known as a heat pipe.
Specifying
Heat Exchangers.
W hen a heat pump has been sized the next choice is the mediums from which heat
is to be exchanged must be considered, options include:
1. Air Conditioner
An Òair conditionerÓ is an air to air heat exchanger which
generally runs a a low COP.
2. Air to Water Heat Exchange.
An air to water heat exchanger takes energy from the air and
transfers to (ideally) underfloor heating. Fans pass air over the heat exchanger. This system has the
advantage that no space for ground source heat exchangers or capital is required for
a GSHE.
However, they are at their least efficient when the need is
greatest, so if for example, cold air at say 0 degrees has to be raised to 35 degrees the COP drops to close to
1. In effect making no carbon or
cash saving on conventional electric heating . They can be noisy and must be
placed where air can flow about them which often makes them prominent and little loved by architects
and designers.
3 Ground source heat pump.
This is always the system which produces the highest COP
when correctly installed and is therefore favoured by planners above all other
forms when possible.
The efficiency of the Heat exchangers is affected by the
thermal insulation properties of the material in which it is placed. For
example, in peat which has a high insulation value a greater area of heat
exchanger for the energy to be extracted (measured in Watts) is required than
in wet sand which as a low insulation value. Heat exchangers are sized and the
particular type of HE specified when the following information has been gained:
Energy requirements (Watts or Kilowatts)
This is calculated based on the size of the area to heated
and cooled and the insulation
value of the materials of which it is constructed. This has changed over time
and new build properties will have to comply with new legislation (Part L 2007)
which demands the highest insulation ever specified in the UK. Demand is
usually measured in kw at 2000 hours
per year.
Available space (Square Meters)
Where high density building is planned the horizontal space
available for heat exchangers will be limited and therefore reduce the options
available.
Geological factors.
Where solid rock
is at or near the surface cone penetration techniques may not be used and drilling may be the
only available method of installing Heat exchangers. The availability of water
and the ground material in which the heat exchangers are installed have varying
heat transferring properties.
With this information the size and type of Geo Source Heat
Exchanger is calculated and specified and the various forms of heat exchanger
installations considered and costed. This is usually given as a figure in
Kilowatt hours per annum that must
be achieved and warranted.
The end cost cannot be concluded precisely because of
unknown factors that might arise when the ground is actually penetrated,
experience will usually enable a reasonably accurate guess
Types of Ground
Source Heat Exchangers
There are two basic
types of Ground Source Heat Exchangers:
1. Open loop.
2. Closed Loop.
Open loop. in the U.K.
the minority of installations use this form
A heat exchanger where the energy is extracted from or
inserted into the primary source, for example, water may be extracted from an
aquifer; river or stream then passed through a heat exchanger and then back to
the aquifer, river or stream at a different location at a different
temperature.
Benefits
Large quantities of energy may be sourced or disposed of
with minimum construction costs. When water is available this is the most cost
effective form of heat exchanger.
Limitations
Raises concerns
with environmentalists (and in the UK the Environment Agency) There are dangers of the changes
in water temperature affecting the ecosystems of surface water (as happens in
the discharge from power stations) or of pollution of aquifers whilst the water
is brought to the surface.
Whilst this type of heat exchangers may be considered in a
minority of applications, special consideration must be given to these
peripheral issues. It may suit cooling only applications well, but it can be
difficult to achieve reliable heating from open loop H Es in typical UK
conditions.
Closed Loop . The majority of GSHE's in the UK are of this type.
A
non-corrosive, biodegradable anti
freeze mixture is passed by the primary source and energy extracted or inserted
by convection, (heat exchange), into the loops fluid.
The fluid is pumped to a heat pump where the energy is
extracted or inserted before repeating the process.
With all
plastic pipe based heat exchangers, there is a long expected life (equal to gas
and water pipes installed by the utility companies.) Perhaps a hundred years.
There is little oxygen in the ground reducing oxidation, no light (Ultra
violet) exposure and no extremes of temperature. Any pipes now laid will be
expected to exceed the writerÕs life span.
Installation of
Ground source Heat Exchangers
There are various ways in which exchangers can be installed,
principally:
1. Horizontally
2. Vertically.
Horizontal Installations
The ground is excavated to enable coils (often called
ÒslinkyÓ ) of thin walled plastic pipe to be installed, generally at a depth of
between 1 or 2 metres below the surface.
Where more than one H E pipe is used they are joined using a manifold to
make a two ended circuit leading to and from the heat pump. After pressure
testing the pipe is ÒblindedÓ or covered with sand and the excavation refilled
and compacted and reinstated.
As a rule of
thumb the area required for the HE is approximately twice the area to be heated
or cooled. In 2006, this was the most common method of installing GSHE's. It is
important that in installing these exchangers all underground services and
obstructions are identified and worked around safely. It is also important that
topsoil (if there is any on site) be stockpiled and replaced separately from
the subsoil.
Generally, horizontally fitted heat exchangers may be cost
effectively used in low density projects, such as full barn conversions where
ornamental gardens are not established and space is not at a premium. It is
unlikely that they will be practically used in typical modern high density building
situations.
Benefits
It requires low
technology and may be the least costly method. When the ground is correctly reinstated leaves no
permanent visible footprint.
Limitations:
The large surface area required.
Obstruction or damage to existing services.
The disruption made during installation
Limitations on later development.
May be affected by tree roots.
Other Horizontal Applications
HE's may be placed in lakes or streams in the form of mats
or coiled plastic pipes.
It is possible be install plastic HE pipes under butyl or
other lake lining materials at the time of construction.
Patent Plastic ÒradiatorsÓ can be used to extract energy in a minimum of space . These are
controversial at the moment as there are fears that too much energy may be
extracted from a small area and that the ground may consequently freeze. When
this happens the anti freeze mixture may become slushy and stop the heat pump.
Benefits
No construction costs, (if installed at the time of construction
of water features)
Apart from trenching (at about 1 metre depth) to the heat
pump.
Limitations
If coils are placed in the bottom of lakes this may well
affect the ecosystem of the lake by allowing the water temperature of the lake
to be reduced , affecting fish that
go to the warmer water at the bottom of the lake during the winter
months. If the water temperature is raised during the summer months this will
reduce the waters ability to carry oxygen and aversely affect fish.
In time, the lake will require dredging, removing detritus
from leaves etc. At that time it
will be necessary to place on one side the HE. This will be dirty and difficult
and will probably damage the pressurised HE system
Vertical
Installations
This may be undertaken either by:
1. Hydraulic pushing technology.
2. Drilling
Heat exchangers are fitted vertically into the ground and
joined together at 1 metre or so depth and trenched in to the heat pump.
The heat exchangers vertically inserted into the ground are
of two principle types:
1. Coaxial
2. U tube.
Coaxial
A coaxial heat exchanger is made by inserting a slightly
shorter narrower pipe into a larger pipe on which the bottom end has been
capped. The exchange fluid is pumped down the outside pipe (where it exchanges
heat with the surrounding material)
and then is forced up the inner pipe. The temperature of the fluid is
affected by this journey. The piping used is considerably less expensive than
the alternatives however this form of heat exchanger can be less efficient than
U tube exchangers.
U tube
Exchange fluid is pumped down one side of the u tube and
forced up the other. The temperate of the fluid is affected by this journey.
Whilst more expensive to manufacture U tube and double U loop exchangers do not have direct
thermal contact between the fluid entering and leaving the exchangers, and are
consequently slightly more efficient than coaxial systems.
There are 2 main methods of installing vertical heat
exchangers:
1. Hydraulic pushing technology
2. Drilling
Hydraulic Pushing
Technology.
A self contained truck is driven on to
site. Hollow steel rods are pushed into the ground using hydraulic rams on the
truck. A sacrificial cone is used to stop the interior of the rods filling with
the material pushed though. A coaxial heat exchanger is inserted into the
hollow rods and rods removed. The substructure then pushes the soil back around
the exchanger. Trenches are dug between the array of heat exchangers are joined
to make a circuit to and from the heat pump using fusion welded manifolds and
horizontal pipe work. If this is undertaken at a depth of less than 1.2 metres
the horizontal array is insulated be insulated. The system is pressure tested
the horizontal array blinded or covered with sand, the trenches are refilled,
compacted and the ground reinstated
Benefits
Fast
Low installation costs.
Low site interference
No cuttings or ÒmudÓ disposal required
No cross level contamination
Limitations.
Only suitable in sedimentary (non rock) applications
Greater number of HE's may be required because of practical
maximum Òpush depthÓ
The trenching for the connecting pipe work may cross
existing services.
Drilling.
Using either
rotary percussion or sonic technology.
A rig and appendages is brought to site and a vertical hole drilled and
lined with hollow steel rods. The spoil (ÒarisingÓ) and lubricant ÒmudÓ is
removed from site. A heat exchanger is inserted into the bored hole, the air
gaps filled with a high thermal conductivity grouting and the steel rods
withdrawn.
Benefits
Able to achieve any reasonable specified depth what ever the
geology underlying the project.
Minimum space requirement after installation because of the
minimal numbers of HE's.
ÒSonic
drillingÓ, from Canada may be able to operate without drilling Òmud Òin certain
applications.
Limitations
Generally slow
Generally drilling requires lubricants to carry the cuttings
from the well head. This and the cuttings must be disposed of.
Rotary
percussive drilling sets up vibrations which may affect near by geology and
others.
The spoil if contaminated may require special arrangements
for its safe disposal.
It may be
necessary to line the bore hole. Etc.
Dangers of inter layer contamination.
Summary.
There is major rhetoric from central government about
lowering carbon footprint for buildings however the main driver appears to be
coming from local Government planning departments particularly following Ò The
Merton RuleÓ when Merton council
changed to the word
ÒexpectsÓ in stating its demand for 10% renewable where planning permission was
sought. The baton has been picked up by others not least the mayors office for London. The
demand for renewable as a criteria for
all planning permission is being legislated. Zero carbon footprint
communities are being planned in development areas in London. The Department of
Trade and Industry web site outlines the governments position. The grant and
tax saving structure is unreliable
Whilst there is many a slip twixt cup and lip the author
sees no possibility of the increase in heat exchangers demand decreasing despite promised price cuts
from fossil fuel purveyors such as British Gas and the 7 sisters oil companies.
Established heating engineers proficient in the use of
underfloor heating as well as established drilling companies are thriving in
the race for dominance in the emerging industry.
New consultancies combining renewable energy techniques are, at time of writing rapidly establishing combining and expanding.
We are at the start of a new age in energy control and
use the effect of which will be as
great as that of the computer age.
How necessary and what fun!
Acknowledgements.
In researching this primer I have had the pleasure of help,
advice and conversations with many
kind people including: Harry Hart of Green Deserts and Sunseed, Andrew
Sheldon of Ice Energy. Tony Book of Riomay, Eric Zon, and Rob Gardener of Lankelma Ltd. Steve
Grey of Cool Planet. Nick Wincott of Econic., Dr Robin Curtis of Earth Energy.
David Hirst of
RL Tec, Ian Dove of British
Geological Survey. Rosemary Rawlins of BRE
Mr Wim .... of ......, Robert Harden of CIAT, Hugh Jones of
Viessman, Andrew Honey of Microgeneration, David Neame of Neame Design and help and support of my wife Leslie